Smile in Each Moment

Smile in Each Moment


Smile in Each Moment

Posted: 13 May 2013 01:05 PM PDT

By Leo Babauta

There's a tendency to get caught up in the tasks of our day, the urgency of what's coming up, the distractions of being online.

And we forget to smile.

In the rush of the day, the stress of wanting things to happen a certain way, we lose the enjoyment of each moment.

In every moment, there's the capacity for happiness. It's not that we need to be ecstatic, full of pleasure, excited or even joyous each and every second of the day. Who needs that kind of pressure? And it's not that we can never feel sadness or anger or stress. It's that we can feel happiness, in some form, any moment we like, even in the midst of stress or sadness.

And it's exceedingly simple. We just need to remember to smile.

You can smile in each and every moment.

OK, maybe you don't need a smile on your face all day long — your cheeks will feel tired. But we can smile more, and in between physical smiles, we can have an internal smile.

Try an internal smile now: have a calm, unsmiling face, but think of the miracle of this moment, and find a thought to smile about. Feel the smiling feeling inside. Isn't that amazing?

What do you have to smile about in this moment?

Some ideas:

  • You have someone in your life who cares about you.
  • There is beauty all around you, in many forms.
  • You are generous, compassionate, and good-hearted.
  • You have someone you can help.
  • You have eaten today.
  • You can move.
  • You can see the sun shining.
  • You can appreciate the leaves of a tree, rain falling, wind blowing.
  • You can taste chocolate.
  • You get to spend time with someone you love.
  • You have music in your life.
  • You get to create something.

And so on. You probably don't have all of these, but you might have one or two, and if so, that's a more than good enough cause to smile.

You'll forget to smile in some moments, because your mind gets caught up in stories about the past, stresses about what might happen in the future. None of this is happening right now — it's just movies playing in our heads.

Instead, remind yourself of what's happening right now, and see the beauty in it, see the reason to smile. And then smile, externally and internally.

This changes your day, because now instead of being caught up in stress and stories, we are present, and happy. We can be content with every moment.

It changes your life, because too often we miss the smile-ability of life when we are not paying attention.

Read More @ Source



It’s Not You, It’s Them: 11 Frenemies You Should Dump Today

Posted: 13 May 2013 11:00 AM PDT

Relationships are an accumulation of life's continuous serendipity, but friendships are intentional.

We choose to let others influence us, and we rely on them to provide modeling, mentorship, and assistance.

But what if those friends actually did more harm than good?

Those are called "frenemies." These people wreck your mood, kill your productivity, and complicate your life.

Some have bad intentions, while others are clueless about their negative effects.

Whether these toxic influences are sabotaging you intentionally or not, identifying and removing them from your life can dramatically improve your health, wealth, and general well-being.

11 Frenemies You Should Dump, Right Now
  1. Needy Nancy: She is constantly insecure about "us" and needs frequent reinforcement that you are still friends. If more than a week goes by without a coffee, lunch, or long chat, things get awkward fast. Real friendships are a two-way street, and Nancy is always driving in the same direction. 
  2. Competitive Charlie: He wants what you have, and he's watching to see what "edge" he can get. Everything is a contest, and he's more interested in getting ahead than supporting your successes. Realize that he doesn't have your back — and you shouldn't have his.
  3. Debbie Downer: Life sucks and she knows it. The glass is always half-empty, people are inherently evil, and nothing can change her mind. Be careful — Debbie will wet your blanket before long. 
  4. Broadway Bob: If he were a play or movie, it would certainly be classified as a drama. Just when sailing gets smooth, controversy strikes, and he always seems to be involved. It usually starts with a "Did you hear?" or "As a friend, I just wanted to let you know…." Life doesn't have to ! be that complicated. 
  5. Networkin' Noreen: She is always slingin' cards and hustling for "bidness." Your friendship is measured by what you can do for her. No matter the topic of conversation, her services take center stage, and she's always angling for a good introduction. This is a pseudo friendship of convenience, so start making it inconvenient.
  6. Listless Larry: You're pretty sure he's not a zombie, though his life is completely devoid of ambition, purpose, or anything meaningful. He doesn't believe in much and judges anyone who's "involved." Unless you, too, want to float through life with little more than some old records and a lifetime supply of Funyuns, steer clear.
  7. Judge Jacky: Life is her courtroom, and everyone is the accused. No one is ever smart enough, good-looking enough, rich enough, or Christian enough to meet her standards. Unless you love being the defendant, I suggest you let court recess.
  8. Flaky McFlakerson: He's consistently inconsistent. Forty percent of the time, he shows up every time. You now expect a last-minute "something came up" and a constant barrage of poorly designed excuses. Friendship is about reliability, and this guy is your 1983 Yugo.
  9. Climbing Carey: No matter what or who stands in her way, she is moving on up. Her past is laden with "former friends" who became collateral damage. When she condescendingly talks about having kids in "like 10 years," you get the feeling she might eat her own young. Back away slowly before you get sacrificed on her career altar.
  10. Devilish Don: While he has three kids, a beautiful wife, a good job, and an enviable golf swing, Don wants more. People "take themselves too seriously." He's all about "getting wasted," hitting on the cart girl, and talking crap about his "worthless" wife. It's best to leave that party before his values get you into trouble.
  11. Groupie Gail: She's your biggest f! an. She a! lways "likes," retweets, and congratulates. Need her opinion? She waffles until finding the response that pleases you the most. While she makes you feel great temporarily, Gail dangerously distorts reality. Real friends challenge and debate with transparency. Unless you need your pillow fluffed, I'd suggest leaving Gail at the next tour stop. 
The "Average of Five" Rule

The "Average of Five" rule states that you are an average of your five closest friends.

I've found it to be surprisingly accurate, and the company you keep is a good indication of the person you will become.

Surround yourself with people whose traits you admire, and prepare to soak up their positive, productive, and healthy influence.
Written on 5/13/2013 by Brent Beshore. Brent Beshore is the founder and CEO of adventur.es (#28 on 2011 Inc. 500), which identifies problems to tackle and looks for those who share their passion to create change. He is also a venture partner at Gen Y Capital, a regular contributor to Forbes, Huffington Post, and Washington Post, and a runner-up in the 2011 VH1 Do Something Awards (lost to Lady Gaga) for his work in helping his hometown of Joplin, Mo., recover from the devastating tornado. Connect with Brent on Twitter, LinkedIn and Google+.Photo Credit
Have a bucket list? Create yours today with this list of 101 things to do before you die! Grab your free pdf e-book in the next second by signing up for the free newsletter.


Read More @ Source



Developing compassion: instructions from an ancient source (plus commentary)

Posted: 13 May 2013 09:00 AM PDT

100 Days of LovingkindnessSo far I've just been advising people to do the metta bhavana (development of lovingkindness) practice while bearing in mind the sufferings of others, but karuna bhavana (the development of compassion) is a practice in its own right. I thought I'd take an opportunity to geek out by looking at an early source of instruction on this practice.

The "Path of Liberation" (Vimuttimagga) by Upatissa is the oldest meditation manual that I know about. It was probably written in the 1st century, several hundred years after the Buddha's death. It's from India, but the text has only survived in Chinese translation.

The scriptures of the Pali canon, which contain records of the Buddha's teachings, were written down a few hundred years earlier, but they don't contain any coherent and structured guides to this meditation practice. The Buddha is recorded in those earlier scriptures as saying, for example, that we should cultivate lovingkindness and compassion, but there's little detail as to how. For those of us familiar with the various stages into which lovingkindness and compassion meditations are divided, there's none of that to be found in the Buddha's teachings.

That doesn't mean that the forms we've learned are wrong. Maybe what we do was taught or practiced in the Buddha's day, but wasn't written down (or memorized in a formal way) for some reason. Or perhaps the techniques evolved and were improved upon, as generations of meditators continued to explore these practices. No one knows.

But I thought it would be interesting to show how the Upatissa presented the development of compassion, and to offer a little commentary.

Based on the Vimuttimagga, the Karuna Bhavana practice is as follows:

  1. We cultivate lovingkindness (or compassion) for ourselves.
  2. We cultivate compassion for someone we think of as suffering.
  3. We cultivate compassion for a neutral person.
  4. We cultivate compassion for a person we have difficulty with.
  5. We extend our compassion to all beings.

So there are five stages here. Now let's look at what the Vimuttimagga says about developing compassion.

THE IMMEASURABLE THOUGHT OF COMPASSION

So the title is "The Immeasurable Thought of Compassion." The four practices of which compassion is a part are collectively called the "immeasurables," because the mind imbued with these qualities embraces all beings. It's not that we literally feel love for each individual being, but that the mind itself is completely filled with lovingkindness, compassion, etc., and that any being we encounter or think of is met with kindness and compassion.

I don't know what's being translated as "thought" in the title above, but compassion is much more than a thought, although reflection is used to help us contact and develop our compassion. But the word "thought" is reminding us that we're not actually "acting" compassionately while we're meditating, although our meditation should lead to compassionate action. Compassion is more a volition or intention than either a thought or an emotion.

Q. What is compassion? What is the practising of it? What are its salient characteristic, function and manifestation? What are its benefits? What is the procedure?

A. As parents who on seeing the suffering of their dear and only child, compassionate it, saying, " O, how it suffers!", so one compassionates all beings. This is compassion. One dwells undisturbed in compassion — this is called the practising of it. The non-manifestation of non-advantage is its salient characteristic. Happiness is its function. Harmlessness is its manifestation. Its benefits are equal to those of loving-kindness.

This is a typical commentarial device — breaking a subject area down into manageable units in order to provide a comprehensive definition from various angles.

The definition of compassion is very interesting: "As parents who on seeing the suffering of their dear and only child, compassionate it, saying, " O, how it suffers!", so one compassionates all beings. This is compassion." This is reminiscent of the teaching in the Buddha's Metta Sutta:

Just as with her own life
A mother shields from hurt
Her own son, her only child,
Let all-embracing thoughts
For all beings be yours.

"Compassionate" here is an archaic verb meaning simply "to have compassion for."

The illustration suggests that compassion is something very natural. We already have compassion for children and others close to us, and so what we need to do is to extend that to others.

"One dwells undisturbed in compassion — this is called the practising of it." We just need to practice! It's just like any other form of exercise — you develop the faculty by "dwelling" in it. By connecting with our innate wish that beings be free from suffering, and by dwelling upon that volition, it becomes a stronger part of our character. We can cultivate compassion in everyday life, of course, but our efforts will always be interrupted. In meditation our exercising of compassion is relatively "undisturbed," giving us time to really "work out" our "compassion muscles."

"The non-manifestation of non-advantage is its salient characteristic." I think "non-manifestation simply means "not doing" and "non-advantage" means "hindering" or "blocking." So the salient characteristic of compassion is that we don't make life hard for others, which is what we tend to do a lot of the time, don't we?

"Happiness is its function." I rarely find the karuna bhavana practice, unlike metta bhavana, to be joyful! Perhaps what's meant here is that we help others to be happy? Or maybe "happiness" is a poor translation of "non-suffering"? I'm really not sure. The "function" given in the Vimuttimagga for lovingkindness is "the thought of lovingkindness," which isn't terribly helpful. "Non-fear" is the function of mudita, or appreciative joy. I find it hard to see a pattern here. Buddhaghosa, five hundred years later, has "Its [i.e. compassion's] function resides in not bearing others' suffering." By this he means that we don't ignore other's suffering. We don't just go, "Suffering? Meh!" We are actually concerned to relieve suffering. Maybe something got lost in translation from Pali (or maybe it was Sanskrit — we don't know the original language) to Chinese to English.

"Harmlessness is its manifestation." This is much clearer. Harmlessness is more often called "non-harm" (ahimsa). When we're compassionate we don't intentionally cause harm, or even act in ways that obstruct others' happiness.

What is the procedure ? The new yogin [meditator] enters into a place of solitude and sits down with mind collected and undisturbed. If he sees or hears of a person stricken with disease, or a person affected by decay, or a person who is full of greed, he considers thus: "That person is stricken with suffering. How will he escape suffering?".

Now we get onto the details of practice.

You may notice that there's no "self-compassion" stage! There's not even a self-metta stage. We just plunge straight in. Or so it would seem. But Upatissa has just explained the lovingkindness practice, which is very detailed, and says at the end of the guidelines for practicing compassion that "the rest is as was fully taught above," so I'm assuming he was just giving brief instructions here, and that self-metta (or self-compassion) is meant to be cultivated.

So when he says that the meditator sits "with mind collected and undisturbed," I take it that this is a reference back to the lovingkindness instructions, where he presents a long list of things that the meditator should wish for at the start of the metta bhavana practice, including,

One should wish to be endowed with tranquillity, to be free from hatred, to be endowed with all merits and to gain good advantages. One should wish to gain a good reward, a good name, to gain confidence, to gain happiness, to be endowed with virtue, knowledge, liberality and wisdom. One should wish for happy sleep and happy awaking. One should wish to have no evil dreams.

So this is a very extended and detailed form of "May I be well; may I be happy" etc. Basically it's self-metta, or even self-compassion.

Upatissa skips the "dear friend" stage, and this time I don't think it's because the practice instructions are abbreviated. My sense of Upatissa's thinking in skipping the "friend" stage is that in the metta bhavana practice we have the friend as the person for whom we (should) naturally have metta, while the suffering person is someone for whom we (should) naturally feel compassion.

And again, if he sees or hears of a person of perverted mind and bound with the defilements, or a person entering into ignorance, or one, who, having done merit in the past does not now train himself, he considers thus: "That person is stricken with suffering; he will fare ill. How will he escape suffering?".

Then we have the "suffering person" stage, where we call to mind someone who is obviously suffering, physically or mentally, and develop the thought for them: "That person is stricken with suffering. How will he escape suffering?"

So we're wishing that this person be free from suffering. This includes all kinds of suffering, not just the more obvious things like sickness, bereavement, etc.

And again, if he sees or hears of a person who follows demeritorious doctrines and does not follow meritorious doctrines, or of a person who follows undesirable doctrines and does not follow desirable doctrines, he considers thus: "That person is stricken with suffering; he will fare ill. How will he escape suffering?".

Wishing for the welfare of those who follow demeritorious doctrines would have been important for a monk, since by the time Upatissa was writing, Buddhism had splintered into many competing sects. And although Stress Reductions are (ahem!) not supposed to have ill will for those with differing views, it's inevitable that this is going to happen.

Our equivalent would be those with different political views. It's natural that we will feel threatened or angered by people having differing views, but we can combat this by contemplating how those views might lead to suffering. And if they don't lead to suffering, why are we so bothered about them?

That yogin by these means and through these activities develops the thought of compassion for these persons and repeats it. Having by these means and through these activities developed the thought of compassion and repeated it, he makes his mind pliant, and capable of bearing the object. Thereafter he gradually develops (compassion) for an indifferent person and an enemy. The rest is as was fully taught above. Thus he fills the four directions.

So this is rather interesting. It's by cultivating the volition of compassion for the four people who have been in the practice that we get to the point where the mind is "capable of bearing the object." So the object is "all beings." We've been practicing cultivating compassion for beings who are suffering and for whom we naturally would feel compassion, for those whose suffering we'd normally ignore, and for those whose suffering we might normally wish for! This gives the mind "pliancy" and allows us to meet any individual with a mind imbued with compassion.

Read More @ Source



Early Morning Buddhist Inspiration - 5/13/2013

Posted: 13 May 2013 06:00 AM PDT

"There is nothing more dreadful than the habit of doubt. Doubt separates people. It is a poison that disintegrates friendships and breaks up pleasant relations. It is a thorn that irritates and hurts; it is a sword that kills."
 
~The Buddha


Bookmark and Share
Technorati Tags: Buddha Buddhist Buddhism Meditation Dharma
Read More @ Source



Cmdr Chris Hadfield sings Bowie's 'Space Oddity' in ISS farewell

Posted: 12 May 2013 10:00 PM PDT



In one of the coolest zero-g cover songs ever recorded, Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield does a heartfelt rendition of David Bowie's classic before returning to Earth. How do you top months of amazing photos, demos, and tunes done aboard the International Space Station? If you're Chris Hadfield, you cover David Bowie's "Space Oddity" in a showstopping finale.

On the eve of his return to Earth, the Canadian astronaut released a beautifully done video of himself singing the 1969 classic.

Mixed with the help of staff at the Canadian Space Agency, musician Emm Gryner, and others, the cover features a somber piano intro and modified lyrics that reference the Soyuz capsule that will return Hadfield to Kazakhstan.

When the mustachioed commander sings "I'm floating in a most peculiar way" while actually floating up in space, Hadfield wins the Internet, as one commenter suggests. The video, meanwhile, has some stunning shots of the station zooming over our planet, as well as Hadfield's acoustic guitar drifting through a module in zero-g.

Hadfield handed over command of the station on Sunday to Russian cosmonaut Pavel Vinogradov. He commended its six-person crew, which organized an unexpected spacewalk on Saturday to repair an ammonia coolant leak.

Organized with unprecedented speed, the spacewalk by Americans Chris Cassidy and Tom Marshburn replaced an ammonia pump! on the station's P6 truss, and they reported seeing no more ammonia flakes coming from the area. Ammonia is used to cool the solar panels powering the ISS.

Marshburn and Russian Roman Romanenko will board the Soyuz spacecraft on Monday evening with Hadfield, who has spent five months on the ISS.

During that time, Hadfield has shown Earthlings how to play guitar in zero-g, safely clip one's fingernails, and even how to cook spinach.

In the process, and along with his eye-popping photos of Earth, Hadfield has become an Internet sensation, conducting Twitter conversations with fellow Canadian spaceman William Shatner--much to the delight of the former's 770,000 followers.

We'll be following Hadfield's reentry on Monday. Meanwhile, here's his version of "Space Oddity."
Enhanced by Zemanta
Read More @ Source



Cmdr Chris Hadfield sings Bowie's 'Space Oddity' in ISS farewell

Posted: 12 May 2013 10:00 PM PDT



In one of the coolest zero-g cover songs ever recorded, Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield does a heartfelt rendition of David Bowie's classic before returning to Earth. How do you top months of amazing photos, demos, and tunes done aboard the International Space Station? If you're Chris Hadfield, you cover David Bowie's "Space Oddity" in a showstopping finale.

On the eve of his return to Earth, the Canadian astronaut released a beautifully done video of himself singing the 1969 classic.

Mixed with the help of staff at the Canadian Space Agency, musician Emm Gryner, and others, the cover features a somber piano intro and modified lyrics that reference the Soyuz capsule that will return Hadfield to Kazakhstan.

When the mustachioed commander sings "I'm floating in a most peculiar way" while actually floating up in space, Hadfield wins the Internet, as one commenter suggests. The video, meanwhile, has some stunning shots of the station zooming over our planet, as well as Hadfield's acoustic guitar drifting through a module in zero-g.

Hadfield handed over command of the station on Sunday to Russian cosmonaut Pavel Vinogradov. He commended its six-person crew, which organized an unexpected spacewalk on Saturday to repair an ammonia coolant leak.

Organized with unprecedented speed, the spacewalk by Americans Chris Cassidy and Tom Marshburn replaced an ammonia pump! on the station's P6 truss, and they reported seeing no more ammonia flakes coming from the area. Ammonia is used to cool the solar panels powering the ISS.

Marshburn and Russian Roman Romanenko will board the Soyuz spacecraft on Monday evening with Hadfield, who has spent five months on the ISS.

During that time, Hadfield has shown Earthlings how to play guitar in zero-g, safely clip one's fingernails, and even how to cook spinach.

In the process, and along with his eye-popping photos of Earth, Hadfield has become an Internet sensation, conducting Twitter conversations with fellow Canadian spaceman William Shatner--much to the delight of the former's 770,000 followers.

We'll be following Hadfield's reentry on Monday. Meanwhile, here's his version of "Space Oddity."
Enhanced by Zemanta
Read More @ Source



Was Buddhism influenced by the Jains?

Posted: 12 May 2013 09:00 PM PDT

Some pop Stress Reductions are always looking for a way to reject the transcendent in Buddhism, as if the Buddha were just any ordinary person—a kind of ancient Stephen Batchelor.  When anything transcendent in the Buddha's teachings pops up, they cry, "It's Hinduism!"  End of discussion.  Here is example of what they would characterize as being  Hindu influenced.  "Man should not give up the self, he should never surrender the self" (S. i. 44) . Or:

"Like the surge of a great ocean, so also birth and old age will roll over you.  Do make a firm island for the self, since there is no other refuge to be found for you" (Theragatha, 412).

First of all, these pop Stress Reductions present no evidence that the Buddha categorically rejected the self or âtman ( P., attâ).  However, there is sufficient scriptural warrant to say that the Buddha rejected what is not the âtman or self, as any sober person can see who has bothered to read the Pali Nikays.  What is not our self, namely, anâtman, which we should reject and transcend according to the Buddha, is the psychophysical body (pañcaskandha).  

Sounding, at times, like they are half crazy, some of these pop Stress Reductions reject, for example, the Buddha-nature because it seems like the Hindu âtman!  According to them, Mahayana Sutras like the Mahaparinirvana show a lot of Hindu influences.  But, where is their evidence?  They really have none.  Even the term "Hindu" means almost nothing. It's a Western term which is Persian.

If anything, early Buddhism was influenced, mainly, by Jainism—not Hinduism.  It can be argued that Jainism appears before the Vedas although there is no hard evidence.  Nevertheless, early on there were religious practitioners in ancient India who were always anti-ritualistic and strongly ascetic given to performing austerities (tapas).  Were these early practitioners the Jains?  They very well might have been.  Next, take the example of transmigration which is often believed to be Hindu. There is very good evidence that the notion of transmigration appears first in Jainism—not in the Brhandaranyaka Upanishad, which is later.

Separating Buddhism from Jainism, including the Jain Order of Pârshva (Pârshva attained nirvana in 777 B.C.), is not an easy matter.  I will go so far as to say that Buddhism appears to be, in some respects, a form of Jainism, but Jainism without severe austerity, substituting in its place, the four jhânas or dhyânas as the correct and uniquely Stress Reduction means to nirvana (nirvana is also a Jaina goal).

Accepting the historical fact that Buddhism developed and grew alongside of Jainism and shared many of its terms and principles, the assertions of the pop Stress Reductions that some elements of Buddhism are Hindu influenced have no real basis.  

Read More @ Source



Was Buddhism influenced by the Jains?

Posted: 12 May 2013 09:00 PM PDT

Some pop Stress Reductions are always looking for a way to reject the transcendent in Buddhism, as if the Buddha were just any ordinary person—a kind of ancient Stephen Batchelor.  When anything transcendent in the Buddha's teachings pops up, they cry, "It's Hinduism!"  End of discussion.  Here is example of what they would characterize as being  Hindu influenced.  "Man should not give up the self, he should never surrender the self" (S. i. 44) . Or:

"Like the surge of a great ocean, so also birth and old age will roll over you.  Do make a firm island for the self, since there is no other refuge to be found for you" (Theragatha, 412).

First of all, these pop Stress Reductions present no evidence that the Buddha categorically rejected the self or âtman ( P., attâ).  However, there is sufficient scriptural warrant to say that the Buddha rejected what is not the âtman or self, as any sober person can see who has bothered to read the Pali Nikays.  What is not our self, namely, anâtman, which we should reject and transcend according to the Buddha, is the psychophysical body (pañcaskandha).  

Sounding, at times, like they are half crazy, some of these pop Stress Reductions reject, for example, the Buddha-nature because it seems like the Hindu âtman!  According to them, Mahayana Sutras like the Mahaparinirvana show a lot of Hindu influences.  But, where is their evidence?  They really have none.  Even the term "Hindu" means almost nothing. It's a Western term which is Persian.

If anything, early Buddhism was influenced, mainly, by Jainism—not Hinduism.  It can be argued that Jainism appears before the Vedas although there is no hard evidence.  Nevertheless, early on there were religious practitioners in ancient India who were always anti-ritualistic and strongly ascetic given to performing austerities (tapas).  Were these early practitioners the Jains?  They very well might have been.  Next, take the example of transmigration which is often believed to be Hindu. There is very good evidence that the notion of transmigration appears first in Jainism—not in the Brhandaranyaka Upanishad, which is later.

Separating Buddhism from Jainism, including the Jain Order of Pârshva (Pârshva attained nirvana in 777 B.C.), is not an easy matter.  I will go so far as to say that Buddhism appears to be, in some respects, a form of Jainism, but Jainism without severe austerity, substituting in its place, the four jhânas or dhyânas as the correct and uniquely Stress Reduction means to nirvana (nirvana is also a Jaina goal).

Accepting the historical fact that Buddhism developed and grew alongside of Jainism and shared many of its terms and principles, the assertions of the pop Stress Reductions that some elements of Buddhism are Hindu influenced have no real basis.  

Read More @ Source



How Mindfulness Can Mitigate the Cognitive Symptoms of Depression

Posted: 12 May 2013 06:01 PM PDT

Word cloud for MindfulnessMargarita Tartakovsky, M.S., PsychCentral: Mindfulness, or paying full attention to the present moment, can be very helpful in improving the cognitive symptoms of depression. These debilitating symptoms include distorted thinking, difficulty concentrating and forgetfulness. Cognitive symptoms can impair all areas of a person's life. For instance, poor concentration can interfere with your job or schoolwork. Negative thoughts can lead to negative emotions, deepening depression.

Focusing on the here and now helps individuals become aware of their negative thoughts, acknowledge them without judgment and realize they're not accurate reflections of reality, writes author William Marchand, M.D., in his comprehensive book Depression and Bipolar Disorder:…

Read the original article »

Read More @ Source



Popular posts from this blog

Red Wine Reduced Breast Cancer Cells

Spiritual Quantum Physics and Insanity

Get Married, Live Longer?